Talk:Bugatti Tourbillon

Feedback from New Page Review process

I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Good start. I've assessed it as Stub.

'''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 02:25, 21 June 2024 (UTC)

Should include a picture and the fact it has gull wing doors

The title ^^^. Other than that, thanks 37.39.131.239 (talk) 06:11, 21 June 2024 (UTC)

Dimensions section

@Bahooka I removed the dimensions section because it is redundant and does nothing but restate the information in the infobox. Check all other Bugatti articles, as well as most major supercar articles. None have a dimensions section simply restating what's in the infobox. If the necessary citations are located in that section (they're repeated citations by the way) then you can move them to the infobox. TKOIII (talk) 04:42, 23 June 2024 (UTC)

My personal preference is to have both locations, but I am open to moving the citations to the infobox rather than the body of the article and then remove that section. I'll try to move them tomorrow as I am going offline right now (or feel free to move the cites to the infobox.) I would be interested in the opinions of other editors, too. Thanks, Bahooka (talk) 04:45, 23 June 2024 (UTC)

I have no strong preference either way, and i'm open to hearing what other editors think. I'm just going off of precedent, and the precedent is that automotive articles rarely include a dimensions section unless it includes additional dimensions like track or different types of weights that aren't able to be included in the infobox template. TKOIII (talk) 04:52, 23 June 2024 (UTC)

I don't like having a dimensions section, dimension specs in the infobox are sufficient IMO, maybe the only thing dimension wise worth mentioning in the body is the weight since its a supercar/sportcar. Alawadhi3000 (talk) 12:52, 23 June 2024 (UTC)