Talk:Buddhism in Nepal

Latest comment: 3 years ago by AviationFreak in topic Merger proposal

No sources provided for this claim edit

"According to archaeological and historical records, Gautama Buddha, the founder of Buddhism, was born in Lumbini, Nepal in 563 BCE." Could someone state where this information was obtained from? No source was provided for this claim in the article. Samson101 03:00, 9 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Cited reference [1], [2] and [3] AG 20:52, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

Any real experts to fix this? edit

Much of this article reads like someone took a collegiate freshman paper and copied it into Wikipedia. Is there anyone out there who can add a more appropriate level of detail, information, and grammar to this composition?

http://www.scribd.com/doc/256726/icon-nepbud

Austerlitz -- 88.75.223.24 (talk) 08:50, 4 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

This article needs serious clean-up and proper citations. I have edited the first few lines and added proper references, others are welcome to do so too. Please refrain from adding contents based on hear-say and without reliable citations. I will be cleaning up the article in coming weeks and months. AG 20:52, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Buddhism in Nepal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:36, 10 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Buddhism in Nepal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:50, 29 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Buddhism in Nepal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:08, 10 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

"6,164,900 which make up 9% of the country population" this is wrong. edit

Last I checked, the last population estimate of Nepal clocked in a about 28.9 Million people. Which would make 9% around 2.6 million people.

For 6'164'900 buddhists to be 9% of the population, or for 9% of the buddhists to be 6'164'900 people, the population of Nepal would have to be well over 60 million people, so something is clearly wrong here.

Which is it, are there 6 million buddhists (which would make the percentage wrong and more between ~20 to ~25%), or is the 9% population correct, which means that the number of Buddhists are much lower? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.18.0.187 (talk) 12:45, 25 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

You are right. The 9% is sourced to the census 2011 in Religion in Nepal and the Nepal article has sourced info of about 26 mio/population in the same year. JimRenge (talk) 13:10, 25 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 01:27, 9 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Merger proposal edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
The result of this discussion was No Merge. AviationFreak💬 04:37, 22 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

I propose a merge of List of monasteries in Nepal into Buddhism in Nepal. I think that the content in the list of monasteries does not constitute an entire article (WP:LISTCRUFT) and can easily be explained in the context of this article. AviationFreak💬 03:52, 22 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

@AviationFreak- You seem to be too fast, you tagged it within few seconds of creation. I was editing the list, and I lost all data. Anyway, I oppose the merge because there are 100s of monasteries that will go in the list. It will just hinder the purpose of the main article Buddhism in Nepal with unnecessary information.nirmal (talk) 04:01, 22 August 2020 (UTC)Reply
@Nirmaljoshi: My apologies - I saw a small list and figured it ought to be merged. If the list will eventually have hundreds of monasteries, might I suggest draftifying it? That way you have a more complete list once the article hits mainspace. AviationFreak💬 04:08, 22 August 2020 (UTC)Reply
@AviationFreak No problem! Since draftifying does not attract potential good editors, I am creating in the main space [proof is your speed of tagging ;) ]. Anyway, I will work on it. nirmal (talk) 04:15, 22 August 2020 (UTC)Reply
@Nirmaljoshi: Sounds good. I honestly didn't realize there were that many monasteries in Nepal, but that seems to be a bit of an oversight on my part. I am now closing this discussion, as I personally do not feel the articles need to be merged. Other users are obviously welcome to create a merge discussion of their own if they feel this decision was premature. AviationFreak💬 04:37, 22 August 2020 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.