Talk:Bryophyllum

In lieu of any references I'm wondering on what authority this article was edited & moved from one POV (Bryophyllum as a genus) to another POV (Bryophyllum as a section of Kalanchoe)--and with no indication that either treatment is a POV! There is as yet no consensus as to whether this group of species should be treated one way or the other. Both views can be found in the botanical and horticultural literature, and both should be reflected in the article. It would make much more sense (and provide a much easier article title!) if Bryophyllum was treated as a genus, with some discussion as to its relationship to Kalanchoe and how it has been treated by various systematists. MrDarwin 00:43, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

Indeed. Now that major databases are beginning to reflect taxonomic consensus, wikipedia can follow those. Sminthopsis84 (talk) 16:56, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bryophyllum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071001172632/http://www.theamateursdigest.com/epoisons.htm to http://www.theamateursdigest.com/epoisons.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:08, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

Hello, the links you had to theamateursdigest.com/epoisons are gone. The site's publisher, my mother, passed away. I'm putting her work back online at https://theamateursdigestarchive.wordpress.com/

where you will find the same article: articles-revived/how-dangerous-are-euphorbias/

at https://theamateursdigestarchive.wordpress.com/articles-revived/how-dangerous-are-euphorbias/

Hope this helps. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.46.180.85 (talk) 05:12, 31 August 2019 (UTC)