Talk:Bruce Nelson Stratton

Article title

ok, so he is notable for being in a hall of fame, but why the move. Don't we prefer going by a person's given name or the one they use? Event he weblink uses "Dr. Bruce" Nelson Stratton Mbisanz (talk) 03:46, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

• Hello, Mbisanz. In making this move, I am taking a cue from biographies of professional wrestlers and entertainers who are best known by their stage name or name they have adopted to overcome some perceived problem with their birth name. The titling is covered under Wikipedia:Manual of Style (biographies), but distinctions as in this case are more community consensus driven unless an edit war emerges. I am ok with doing a second move to Bruce Nelson Stratton ... my feeling is that Dr. Bruce Nelson Stratton is not the best choice because academic titles are generally excluded from article titles (referring to WP:MOSBIO again). However, I'm not sure (from the one web link I've added to the article) what his real given name is ... it might actually be "Nelson Bruce Stratton", for instance. Nonethless, having the articl at either Bruce Nelson Stratton or Nelson Stratton would be ok. Thoughts? --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 13:01, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

I prefer aything that has a given-style name over a personality style name. So Bruce Nelson Stratton is fine by me. MBisanz 09:14, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bruce Nelson Stratton. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071009094132/http://www.kftx.com/bruce.htm to http://www.kftx.com/bruce.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:50, 9 November 2016 (UTC)