Talk:Brown-necked parrot

Untitled

Whether Poicephalus fuscicollis is used as the main page for the 'un-capes' or something else, it's very confusing to have so many mentions in the Cape Parrot article describing P. Robustus as a distinct species while not having a separate page for the other species. This isn't an attempt to boost the argument that they should be considered a separate species—even if the consensus reverts to one species with 3 subspecies, there is still room for a separate article about the South African variant given its precarious conservation status, right?

I may have made a mistake in changing the redirects and starting up Poicephalus fuscicollis as its own article, but it's out of being tired of being confused about what the main article is talking about, not out of an attempt to say one side or another is right in the taxonomic debate.

NOTE: Copying the preceding text to Talk:Cape Parrot in case everything is reverted and the only active talk page is that one (so that the discussion will be preserved there for future Cape Parrot etc editors).—140.153.24.155 (talk) 15:30, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Brown-necked parrot. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140904205703/http://www.birdchannel.com/bird-species/profiles/uncape-parrot-2.aspx to http://www.birdchannel.com/bird-species/profiles/uncape-parrot-2.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:15, 21 December 2017 (UTC)