Untitled edit

I think merging the articles would be appropriate.--Jfurr1981 21:39, 5 November 2005 (UTC)Reply


Whoever put that "numbered" picture up, please put the key for the numbers as well... At least in the picture's page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 139.80.123.34 (talk) 08:46, 1 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Seriously. I'm not going the change it back any more. It is clear that the picture says it is a frontal view. If this is true, and the picture is accurate, then the left divides into three and the right divides into two. Orthografer (talk) 00:13, 16 February 2009 (UTC)Reply


This article suggests that the cartilaginous rings in the trachea are complete, surely this is incorrect? --Sulleh (talk) 20:12, 11 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Proposed merge with Right main bronchus edit

Needless fragmentation. Content is duplicated and Bronchus would benefit from this added material. Iztwoz (talk) 20:29, 23 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Done

Proposed merge with Left main bronchus edit

Needless fragmentation, and repetition. Bronchus would be the better for added content. Iztwoz (talk) 20:33, 23 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Done

Proposed merge with Secondary bronchus edit

Needless fragmentation - material already covered on Bronchus page Iztwoz (talk) 20:20, 12 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Done

Proposed merge with Tertiary bronchus edit

Small subtopic of Bronchus - material already duplicated there Iztwoz (talk) 20:28, 12 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Done