Talk:Broder Daniel
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair use rationale for Image:Broder-Daniel.jpg edit
Image:Broder-Daniel.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 00:00, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
Is there really "a factual dispute" that Broder Daniel were very influental in the alternative music scene in Sweden? edit
I don't see how any swedish person wouldn't agree that bands such as Broder Daniel and Kent were some of the more influental bands in the alternative music scene in the 90's/00's?
Thus, wouldn't this make the "By whom" tag a little unnecessary? I already inserted a possible reference (in Swedish), but as I said, ask any swede and almost everyone will agree that they were indeed influental. Maybe we should just use the source "the entire population of Sweden"? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Carlrosengren (talk • contribs) 19:25, 26 October 2013 (UTC)