Talk:Britney/Brittany/GA1

Latest comment: 14 years ago by Scapler in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: かんぱい! Scapler (talk) 02:19, 9 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

It has been too long since I have given back and done a GA review. So, on first glance and read-through, the article obviously is not eligible for quick-failing, so the full review is to come soon. かんぱい! Scapler (talk) 02:19, 9 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Full review

edit
GA review (see here for criteria)

Article is done very well in a similar manner to all the other Glee episodes (in their multitude) that have reached GA status. This has been a quick review, but after a few reads and a check of accuracy, references, and images, it is obvious to me that this article meets all GA criteria. So, a quick pass for this excellently done article. かんぱい! Scapler (talk) 03:18, 9 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
    There were two or three sentences that I would have not worded the way they are; however, they are mostly from stylistic choice and certainly nothing to worry about in a GAN.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
    All statements and references check out
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
    Everything covered here that is appropriate
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
    One image properly dolled-up with fair use rationale; two free licenses images, all captioned well.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail: