Talk:British 21-inch torpedo

Out of spec

This page says the 21" was introduced to subs with the O-boats in 1927. This page says the last two M-boats had 21" tubes. They can't both be right.... TREKphiler ^{any time you're ready, Uhura} 14:34, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

Possibly the O-class had them as designed, M3 had them when rebuilt in 1927 an afterthought, M4 was going to have them as an experiment but as it was never built... Definitely clarification needed. GraemeLeggett (talk) 16:49, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

That was my thought: the later M-boats completed, or rebuilt, with 21". I don't have the sources to confirm, tho, so if anybody does... TREKphiler ^{any time you're ready, Uhura} 02:36, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

"only the second sinking of a surface ship by any submarine since the end of WWII"

I added a citation needed tag. Could also do with tightening the language as if you include accidental sinkings of fishing craft there are more. Springnuts (talk) 15:31, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

• It now says "This is the only sinking of a surface ship by a nuclear-powered submarine in wartime". The Falklands conflict was not a declared war. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 162.251.232.55 (talk) 00:07, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

21" (53.3 cm) Mark IX and IX**

Where 21" (53.3 cm) Mark IX and IX**?--Inctructor (talk) 23:35, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Mark VIII**

In the reference for "Mark VIII**" the ** is never explained

Laguna CA (talk) 00:07, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

Inconsistency in article

Spec block states Mark IV of 1912 had "burner cycle" power. Portion on Mark VIII of 1927 states it was first british burner cycle torpedo. This not consistent -- cant both be right. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Skb999 (talk • contribs) 09:04, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on British 21 inch torpedo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/world-history/sinking-the-belgrano-the-pinochet-connection-7609047.html?origin=internalSearch
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090601171206/http://www.skomer.u-net.com:80/projects/missiles.htm to http://www.skomer.u-net.com/projects/missiles.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:17, 8 November 2016 (UTC)