Talk:Britain–India–Nepal Tripartite Agreement

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Untitled edit

100,000 Gurkha's in Indian Army? That seems too high. What is the source for this data. --DuKot 05:13, 18 August 2005 (UTC)Reply

See Global Security - as far as I can determine, there have been no appreciable cuts to the Indian Army in the last 15 years; there are certainly still over 40 battalions of Gurkhas in the infantry, and there would also certainly still be Gurkhas in the various support arms (as there are in the British Army). Given the size of the Indian Army (over 1,000,000), I think that 10% of its strength as Gurkhas is a reasonable estimate. Hammersfan 11:10, 4 September 2005

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Britain–India–Nepal Tripartite Agreement. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:59, 8 November 2016 (UTC)Reply