Talk:Brick by Boring Brick

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Cover Art edit

How do you upload something (Picture) to wikipedia without them deleting it? Even If its your own work they delete it. Could someone please tell me? —Preceding unsigned comment added by NicoX448 (talkcontribs) 19:19, 19 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

You seem to have done the cover correctly. You just need to use the correct licensing, etc. Don't make false claims, like that image you have that is clearly of the Ignorance music video, it needs to have an actual reason for being uploaded - see the text beneath the image. I assume it's purposefully made difficult, as this isn't a free-range image uploading service. Kiac 11:48, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

Tracklist edit

Someone put a tracklist up. There were no references and sources. Therefore, it was deleted. Find a reliable source to reference it. Thank you. 71.94.168.240 (talk) 23:33, 23 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Release date edit

Do we have any cited sources for the release date of this single? Terminus777 (talk) 01:42, 27 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

On alternative press, it said when it was released but I didnt find the page. Look it up on alternative press, they should have it still. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.98.226.108 (talk) 23:27, 28 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Genre edit

If you want to put emo as a genre, You have to have a cited source. Thanks 71.94.168.240 (talk) 01:20, 13 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Wouldn't all the genres apply to this. --Thegreene2010 (talk) 16:57, 18 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

The Verifiability policy in a nutshell is said to be: "Material challenged or likely to be challenged, and all quotations, must be attributed to a reliable, published source." I would definitely say emo fits in this category, though other rather obvious genres such as rock do not. So I would be tempted to say no, not all genres apply to this. kiac. (talk-contrib) 07:25, 19 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Video Release Date edit

Hayley didn't say it would be out on the 22nd, she said it would be done.71.94.168.240 (talk) 05:48, 22 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

This is precisely why people should be using third party sources, and not the likes of Twitter. Idiots need someone else to interpret what is said for them. kiac. (talk-contrib) 13:01, 22 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

UK Top 40 Peak edit

I can't find any evidence that it peaked at number one in the UK Top 40 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_number-one_singles_from_the_2000s_(UK) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.201.170.36 (talk) 11:21, 20 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned references in Brick by Boring Brick edit

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Brick by Boring Brick's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "linernotes":

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT 10:24, 19 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Brick by Boring Brick. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:04, 8 November 2016 (UTC)Reply