Talk:Briana Loves Jenna

This article was nominated for deletion on 29 July 2018. The result of the discussion was keep.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Briana Loves Jenna article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Film: American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Pornography Low‑importance

	Erotica and pornography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pornography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of pornography-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PornographyWikipedia:WikiProject PornographyTemplate:WikiProject PornographyPornography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled edit

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Article (and picture) state "Her first boy/girl scene in over 2 years" but the picture is a lesbian pose. Does it have lesbian sex or heterosexual activity or both? CanadianCaesar Et tu, Brute? 02:14, 3 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Edit warring to re-instate BLP violations edit

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

If references can be attached to names they should be. WP:BLP vios though will not be tolerated and are WP:3rr exempt, nor is there any requirement to hgain consensus. What is sim'ply required is to match the refs with the names, that is called verifiability. We dont "not bother" to make extra work for our readers so just match the refs to the names so we can ALL verify what you are claiming. ♫ SqueakBox talk contribs 16:26, 29 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Your edits are way out of policy. Legacypac (talk) 11:10, 30 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Briana Loves Jenna. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20030906175911/http://www.iafd.com:80/title.rme/title=Briana+Loves+Jenna/year=2001/Briana_Loves_Jenna.htm to http://www.iafd.com/title.rme/title=Briana+Loves+Jenna/year=2001/Briana_Loves_Jenna.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:21, 8 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Add topic