Talk:Brewing in Nebraska

	This redirect was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This redirect was accepted on 28 January 2014 by reviewer Spinningspark (talk · contribs).

Beer Low‑importance

	Beer portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Beer, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Beer, Brewery, and Pub related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BeerWikipedia:WikiProject BeerTemplate:WikiProject BeerBeer articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Redirecting the page edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion

@IronGargoyle:. I am surprised that you reverted my addition of sources and changed the page into a redirect. The sources may not be peer reviewed scholarly papers, but your characterisation of them as unreliable is unreasonable. They are perfectly fine for this simple article which is neither a political controversy nor quantum string theory. The BCCA in particular is just the kind of organisation that I would expect to be knowledgeable about breweries and they produce a professional looking monthly magazine. I don't see the problem with referencing their list, surely to goodness the fact that the breweries have featured on someone elses list is an indication of the notability of the list. On the Beer Me! site, for some of the individual entries (see for instance Nebraska Brewing Company) they give references to news articles which in some cases might be enough to justify a stand alone article, let alone just an entry in a list.

This whole issue of the existence of lists of breweries was thrashed out at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of breweries in Connecticut (along with numerous other brewery list articles). That AFD was closed as snow keep and their were two things that came out of that. Firstly, all these articles are to be considered as part of List of breweries in the United States (which is no more than a list of lists) and secondly that WP:CSC applies, that is, the list can be comprehensive. I held off promoting this AFC to mainspace until that AFD had closed. That is, I waited for the outcome of the AFD and accepted it. I think you should accept it too and stop trying to delete by redirect. AFD it if you must, but given the past AFDs, I think we know what the outcome will be.

On the question of the links to external sites, I don't think they were intended as spam links. I think the editor who put them in was just following an established pattern. I am fine with that column of the table being removed, agree with it even, but its existence is really not sufficient justification for blanking out the whole page. Spinning Spark 06:59, 19 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

I hear where you are coming from, and I don't think anymore that these lists are unreasonable. Instead, there needs to be some reasonable inclusion criteria and individual evidence of notability for each entry (even if not a bluelink). You are right that WP:CSC gives potential options for lists of non-notable items. The problem is that in this case it is directly overruled by WP:NOTDIRECTORY. Heck, the policy gives restaurants of a certain type in a certain geographic location as a prime example of a WP:NOTDIRECTORY violation. IronGargoyle (talk) 12:42, 19 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

WP:CSC says quite plainly that individual evidence of notability may not be required. That is one way of selecting for a list, but not the only way. The AFD acceptance of the WP:CSC rationale for keep to my mind means that the AFD thought that a list of breweries in a geographical area would be a small enough list that it could be made complete. The same rationale does not apply to the much larger group of restaurants. Nor to shoe shops or bars. Nor even to doctors or dentists.

You are misreading the example in WP:NOTDIRECTORY. It does not give "restaurants in city x" as an example of an unacceptable directory. Rather it gives "restaurants specializing in x in city y" as an example of an unacceptable cross-categorization. Cross-categorization is a different issue from directories and is aimed at articles like Judaism and bus stops (I realise that that example was not a list article). Spinning Spark 13:39, 19 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Breweries are specializing in beer (in state X), ergo the applicability of the example in WP:NOTDIRECTORY. Maybe the references are reliable, but it seems odd to say that is doesn't violate WP:NOTDIRECTORY when the only references are themselves directories. IronGargoyle (talk) 14:17, 19 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

"Breweries specialize in beer" is as trivial and silly a truism as saying "restaurants specialise in food". In any case, the time to put forward that argument was during the AFDs of the dozens of other lists of breweries you nominated. In the meantime, we now have a clear community consensus on this from the Connecticut AFD to keep such articles. I think it is time to restore this page. Spinning Spark 15:13, 19 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Brewing in Nebraska. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140221220815/http://www.bcca.com/services/brewery_listing_nebraska.asp to http://www.bcca.com/services/brewery_listing_nebraska.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:21, 8 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Brewing in Nebraska. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:29, 25 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic