Talk:BrewDog

Better picture needed

This picture of Brewdog Pink IPA appears to be a screenshot instead of a photograph of an actual can. Does someone have a better picture? I don't know if the beer is even available here in Finland so I don't know if I can take one myself. JIP | Talk 15:52, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

If so, it's probably a copyright concern too. Best to just remove it for now. — HTGS (talk) 01:06, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

Controversies section

As is often the case with such sections, this is a real mixture, in this case of marketing, product, copyright, employee, business practices... While they may relate to an underlying corporate personality, separating it into themed sections would probably aid understanding. Jontel (talk) 10:25, 12 January 2024 (UTC)

I would argue seeing as how the company has marketed itself in the past and trying to stand out as different from larger breweries their actions are relevant to how they publicly present themselves. RLS 84 (talk) 20:23, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

History section

As above, this could also be usefully divided into financing, production, retail and international. Jontel (talk) 13:52, 12 January 2024 (UTC)

Introduction

It seems very unusual to me that even in the opening paragraph of this article it is already mentioned that "The company has been involved in a number of controversies. These have focused on its treatment of employees, its use of unethical business practices, and hypocrisy in regards to its anti-establishment branding."

I would argue this is hardly such a defining characteristic of this company that it belongs in the introductory paragraph. Most multinational companies have experienced some type of controversy. Where is such a mention in the introductory paragraph of McDonalds, Shell, Coca Cola?51.9.166.169 (talk) 11:21, 17 January 2024 (UTC)