Talk:Brenda and Robert Vale

Biography assessment rating comment

WikiProject Biography Assessment

The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 19:32, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

I edited the term "leading expert". In my day job as a newspaper editor I receive press releases claiming that such-and-such company are the "leading" firm in their field. In my opinion, 'PR puff' terms do not belong in a biography.92.10.76.46 (talk) 23:46, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

Reference to wind power, Autonomous House, Southwell.

I am unaware of any wind power facility in place at the "New Autonomous House". Perhaps this point could either be clarified or removed?

- (former resident of the house). DBSouthwell 19:40, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Links to Oil Companies?

The Vale's have been paid off by oil companies to distract from the carbon pollution caused by large vehicles. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.217.240.32 (talk) 06:04, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

Done. 14Sept07. MJD. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.30.249.52 (talk) 09:29, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

Book

Green Architecture: Design for a Sustainable Future Hardcover, September 9, 1991 by Brenda Vale and Robert Vale, ISBN 978-0500341179 --87.153.119.239 (talk) 11:55, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Scientifically Dubious?

The reference states:

... Mind-bending stuff, and more than a little scientifically dubious ("I wouldn't have thought a dog had anywhere near as high a carbon footprint as a car," says John Buckey, managing director of carbonfootprint.com)."

So, someone running a website called Carbonfootprint is surprised over the result; is that sufficient to call a scientific study dubious? 00prometheus (talk) 23:09, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

The Wikipedia article currently says the conclusions are "debateable", which seems a fair comment. I agree "dubious" it a stronger, more negative word. Judging by the conclusion of the opinion piece ("cats are far tastier") the 'news' article seems slightly tongue-in-cheek anyway. Sionk (talk) 14:30, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Brenda and Robert Vale. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131219021700/http://www.takepart.com/article/2013/12/16/pets-are-killing-earth to http://www.takepart.com/article/2013/12/16/pets-are-killing-earth

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:27, 24 January 2018 (UTC)