Talk:Brawl (game)

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Untitled edit

I would just like to debate a point over the new Fight! decks. On the contrary of what seems to be a popular belief, I do not think that these decks are realy related to the 6 original decks. Altough these decks are certainly based in design to the the originals, that does not make them the same. Not even when most of the original decks could be constructed out of the 44 cards by the means of removing 9 (there was 1 original deck that could not be recreated by this mean, but I do not remember wich).

As a side note, I used to own both the Fight! decks as well as the 6 originals, even tough I have managed to loose both sets by this time.

Pirtu 15:22, 21 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Brawl (game). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:23, 7 November 2016 (UTC)Reply