Talk:Braunston Cleves or Fawcliff

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Northamptonshire Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Northamptonshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Northamptonshire-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NorthamptonshireWikipedia:WikiProject NorthamptonshireTemplate:WikiProject NorthamptonshireNorthamptonshire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Braunston Cleves edit

Latest comment: 16 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Hello again RHaworth

Please change this page back to its original designation. I have done my research on this matter and there is no definitive correct name. On the OS map the name of the site is Fawcliff (see the Map on) [1] but that two has the other name on it. Local records show the settlements by both names.Stavros1 (talk) 20:59, 22 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Dont worry, I have redirected the page myselfStavros1 (talk) 21:21, 22 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

I think this policy statement is clear enough: we put the article on one of the names and use redirects for the others. However, since moving articles about seems a pointless exercise (providing the redirects exist), I will let you have your way. -- RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 00:48, 23 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

- I have noted your comments and agree that in the case, for example, a welsh place name, (i.e. WREXHAM or Welsh GWRECSAM) where the name may be in the native designation and also have a British/English name then what you point out is appropriate but I think this example should be used as an exception to the rule as the name has never been agreed, and the two names are different and not a translation or native name. Thank you for your impute and interest in this page.Stavros1 (talk) 14:09, 23 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Add topic