Talk:Brandywine (tomato)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
WikiProject Food and drink Tagging
editThis article talk page was automatically added with {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . Maximum and careful attention was done to avoid any wrongly tagging any categories , but mistakes may happen... If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 02:00, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
Klingaman cites in 2004 are the same article
editThe inline citation to Gerald Klingaman 2004 about these tomatoes (& the rediscovery of Gregor Mendel’s work) is the same text as what is cited in Further reading. The inline citation is to a reliable source, the U of Arkansas Cooperative Extension Service. The Further reading is sourced to Delta Press, but it seems not to be part of book, as far as I can see. Is there a reason to keep the Further reading section in this article, as it is an exact duplicate of the inline source in the References? —Prairieplant (talk) 03:46, 31 July 2018 (UTC)