Talk:Bragança, Portugal

I think there is definite scope here for separate articles about the city and the municipality, as the two are different but the article is a little confusing for the uninitiated. Thoughts? Deizio 23:05, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

I have found text in portuguesse, copied and pasted it in the portuguese wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sergio.solar (talk • contribs)

Why "Municipality" in the title?

Why "Municipality" in the title? If it is to avoid confusion with other entries, then surely this should be done in the disambiguation page. We don't have pages called "London Municipality", "San Francisco Municipality", "Oxford Municipality" etc, do we? Rui ''Gabriel'' Correia (talk) 10:52, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Likely to distinguish it from the district of Bragança. The reality is that in the Portuguese namespace there are different politico-administrative entities that may exist with the same name: the (former) districts, municipalities (concelhos) and/or civil parishes (freguesias), as well as the social construct associated with the urban entity (town/city). In order to remedy these distinctions, those involved in Wikiproject Portuguese Geography started creating qualifiers, for example "(parish)", or "(district)", while the "concelhos" were left as is (for example "Bragança" was the name of the municipality, and had information on the urban city). But, on 16 October 2009, User:TrueColour (a sockpuppet of User:Tobais Conradi) started re-qualifying all Portuguese municipalities as "XXXXX Municipality", while others started creating pages for "municipalities" when those geographical areas included MORE then just the urban entity. I would support a revert to the old article name; Bragança could easily be re-named/reverted from "Bragança Municipality" to the 9 May 2006 title (then validly renamed by User:Mário "Bragança (Portugal)" or even the original "Bragança, Portugal"), as the "district" article is distinct on its own. There could be some conflict in keeping it just "Bragança", since a town/city in Brazil has this name, as well. ^{ruben jc} ZEORYMER (talk) 11:59, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Thanks, ZEORYMER, for a very constructive and informative response. As for not keeping it as merely "Bragança" because of a city by the same name in Brazil, surely there is a principle of hierarchy? There are over 20 Oxfords, but the page for ORIGINAL city of Oxford is simply "Oxford", not "Oxford, UK" or similar, given its history etc. Likewise, there is no comparing the two Braganças - the one in Brazil (not to be confused with Bragança Paulista) is a mere one-liner. Conversely, there are various cities and towns called "Sao Paulo", not all of them have pages in the English WP (http://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/S%C3%A3o_Paulo_(desambigua%C3%A7%C3%A3o)), and we don't have any descriptor next to THE São Paulo. Back to Portugal, we have "Lisbon" - not "Lisbon Municipality" and we have "Lisbon District". That makes sense and Bragança should be the same. Rui ''Gabriel'' Correia (talk) 15:39, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

I agree with your appraisal. Yes, by all means, your right: Bragança can very easily stand on its own. If there are no specific quarrels with other editors, it would make more sense to revert to the original Bragança (disambiguation) page and transferring content there. In writing this response, I discovered that there is a Bragança disambiguation page, but that it redirects to "Bragança", while the municipality page was moved to "Bragança Municipality" by another user (User:Pumpie), whose first language was not English (and who has an indefinite block). Confusing. ^{ruben jc} ZEORYMER (talk) 16:48, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Seeking consensus to move back to Braganca

Dear All. I propose renaming Bragança (municipality) back to the original Bragança. Please see my earlier posts and feedback from Zeorymer. THE HISTORY: It was originally "Bragança", was moved on 30 September 2004 to Bragança, Portugal by User:Pumpie, a rogue editor with a mile-long record of recriminations, of whom his page says: "his user has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia." It was then moved in May 2006 to Bragança (Portugal) by User:Mário - no damage there, merely changing a comma for brackets. It was then moved on 16 October 2009, by User:TrueColour, another editor with a less then honourable track-record, of whom is said on his page: "This account is a suspected sock puppet of Tobias Conradi and has been blocked indefinitely" Blocked october 27, 2009" MOTIVATION: Against the evidence that I submitted in my earlier post, and in view of the fact that the page was moved by discredited editors (Pumpie and TrueColour), I PROPOSE: 1. Moving Bragança to Bragança (disambiguation) 2. Moving Bragança Municipality to Bragança I look forward to your input, Rui ''Gabriel'' Correia (talk) 18:49, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Bragança, Portugal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.dgterritorio.pt/ficheiros/cadastro/caop/caop_download/caop_2014_0/areasfregmundistcaop2014_2
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110514134722/http://www.cm-braganca.pt/PageGen.aspx?WMCM_PaginaId=40388 to http://www.cm-braganca.pt/PageGen.aspx?WMCM_PaginaId=40388
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141006143612/http://dev.igeo.pt/atlas/Cap2/Cap2d_2.html to http://dev.igeo.pt/atlas/Cap2/Cap2d_2.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:02, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bragança, Portugal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110514153152/http://www.cm-braganca.pt/PageGen.aspx?WMCM_PaginaId=6393 to http://www.cm-braganca.pt/PageGen.aspx?WMCM_PaginaId=6393

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:22, 22 May 2017 (UTC)