Talk:Brady House (baseball)

Latest comment: 2 years ago by GeoffreyT2000 in topic Requested move 15 April 2022

Requested move 15 April 2022 edit

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 05:04, 23 April 2022 (UTC)Reply


– This is the only title on this site known as "Brady House". The disambiguation page is mostly made up of a few things that don't have articles, and partial title matches. Is there any evidence of something like McCord-Brady Company and Brady Memorial Chapel being called "Brady House"? I don't see it. The closest is Brady-Brady House, but I don't think that a single house is known much, much less called "Brady House". --Quiz shows 21:31, 15 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

  • You didn't mention The Brady house. Whether something is a separate article or a subtopic within another article doesn't really matter. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 00:02, 16 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose. There are eleven entries listed upon the Brady House disambiguation page, with the 18-year-old baseball player depicted at the top, although there is no indication that his renown throughout the English-speaking world is at such a high level that it overshadows the combined notability of the remaining ten entries. —Roman Spinner (talkcontribs) 03:15, 16 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose fails "Brady House" test in Gbooks In ictu oculi (talk) 11:35, 16 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose per the two above opposes and especially since this page should probably be merged into Nationals prospects anyway. SportingFlyer T·C 15:12, 20 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose (disclaimer as the creator of this article) It's too wide a term currently. Although I'd argue against the sentiment above about merging as GNG is clearly met. Best, GPL93 (talk) 05:49, 21 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.