Talk:Bradshaw's Guide

Latest comment: 5 years ago by 82.44.143.26 in topic Conspicuous absence

Merge from George Bradshaw#Bradshaw's railway guides into Bradshaw's Guide

edit

I don't really have the patience to do it on my own, but I think that the text at the George Bradshaw article should be moved to this one, leaving a lengthy summary in the original location. Any concerns, please say so, or else be bold and move the text. --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 16:16, 11 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

rule of thumb for you

edit

the Bradshaw page is SIX screens, the Guide page is FIVE screens -- once a discreet topic reaches such a size they should NOT be combined; okay, Shakespeare has to be gigantic, but not everybody using Wikipedia has bandwidth or RAM to accomodate large-size pages on lesser topics (for my own website content, I break up pages that reach 100KB of HTML code) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:558:6001:6:3592:5B65:8C7D:E3ED (talk) 20:51, 13 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

I agree.
I suggest we move about four screens from the George Bradshaw page to the Guide page. Then I think the Guide page should then be split up into articles about the different editions.
--Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 21:25, 13 February 2015 (UTC)Reply
Agreed and   Done. Note that the final target page size is only 27kB even with all text moved, so size isn't a problem. Klbrain (talk) 11:45, 9 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

1913

edit

Is there any 1913 version? . I saw a TV Railway series based on it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.175.41.227 (talk) 10:38, 30 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Highly likely. There were several editions every year. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 18:25, 30 July 2017 (UTC)Reply
edit

I suggest adding the following

Alekksandr (talk) 21:23, 18 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Conspicuous absence

edit

Mention of Michael Portillo. 82.44.143.26 (talk) 14:24, 13 September 2019 (UTC)Reply