Wikipedia

Talk:Boy Scouts of America membership controversies/Archive 10

< Talk:Boy Scouts of America membership controversies
Latest comment: 4 years ago by 65.196.107.215 in topic Scouting and the Confederacy
Archive 5 ← Archive 8 Archive 9 Archive 10

Vote

Latest comment: 10 years ago12 comments6 people in discussion

"The approximate 1,400 voting members of the Boy Scouts of America's National Council approved a resolution to remove the restriction denying membership to youth on the basis of sexual orientation alone."[1]

Reactions:

  • The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints reaffirmed its relationship with the BSA.[2]
  • TheAmerican Heritage Girls dissolved their relationship with the BSA. "Memorandum of Mutual Support - Dissolution Statement" (PDF). American Heritage Girls. May 23, 2013.
  • "Since the change in policy will not take effect until January 1, 2014, the National Catholic Committee on Scouting has adequate time to study its effects."[3]
  • Tomlin, Greg (May 24, 2013). "Boy Scouts overturn ban on gay members". Baptist Press.
  • Townley, Alvin (May 24, 2013). "Scouting is bigger than any single policy". USA Today.

--  Gadget850 talk 02:07, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

What is the purpose of this on the Talk Page? I don't get it. GeorgeLouis (talk) 06:58, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
It was added on talk before it was added to the article. If Gadget's like me, sometimes you feel bold, and sometimes you feel like sharing a source and letting someone else actually edit the article. --HectorMoffet (talk) 01:12, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
Well, it's kind of weird that it was posted here, and then added to the article before any significant discussion happened anyway. The LDS church position is important. It provides massive funding to the BSA. For it to affirm that's its relationship will continue, seemingly largely unchanged, is a big thing. As for a conservative Christian girls group, who really cares? It may call itself a Scouting body, but unlike the BSA, it's not part of WOSM, so not globally recognised as part of Scouting. Its position is not at all surprising, and will have minimal impact. It's almost trivial and doesn't belong in the article. HiLo48 (talk) 01:26, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
Included mostly for balance / a token placeholder for "a few people cut ties to BSA over the vote outcome". If a more notable organization breaks ties, I'd suggest pulling the American Heritage Girls mention and replacing it with the more-notable organization. 33% of supporters of the policy said they would quit over a change-- surely there will be at least one council or charter organization that cuts ties over this in the coming days and weeks? --HectorMoffet (talk) 01:40, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
Yes, one wonders about that, but one must not speculate. We must wait. Still think the American Heritage Girls stuff is undue, but I won't fight it. HiLo48 (talk) 01:54, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
And some of us would rather gather information before creating brilliant prose. --  Gadget850 talk 02:25, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
The AHG has less than 1% of the BSA or GSUSA membership. It was the only youth organization with a formal relationship with the BSA, and they are getting a lot of press on this. --  Gadget850 talk 16:11, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
Depending on what circles you travel in, SpiralScouts and BPSA get just as much or more press than AHG. I've already removed references to AHG and other BSA alternatives, because it is impossible to make a balanced, comprehensive list of such groups. Cwgmpls (talk) 16:17, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
I did put a link the the wikipedia "Breakaway Organizations" page in the "Reaction" section. This provides a better overview of the topic of breakaway groups. Cwgmpls (talk) 16:42, 10 September 2013 (UTC)


WP:FORUM
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.

Am I correct in recalling that the BSA have (or rather now, had) a better relationship with the American Heritage Girls than they do with the Girl Scouts of the USA, which is a Scouting organisation, although also not a member of WOSM but is of course a member of WAGGGS, based in part of the fact that the Girl Scouts of the USA have been gay-friendly for a long time? It may be that the BSA will now develop a better relationship with what is its proper female Scouting partner. That will definitely be some something to write about if it happens. If I am correct, it puts the action of the American Heritage Girls in a more notable light. --Bduke (Discussion) 03:26, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

Yes, a better relationship between BSA and the Girl Scouts would be a notable development. But I can't see it happening all that rapidly. Those girls just don't do the God stuff properly. (According to the conservatives in the Boy Scouts at least.)

--  Gadget850 talk 12:16, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

first openly gay leader banned, troop disbanded for keeping leader.

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Gaijin42 (talk) 16:14, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

Historical Membership Data

Latest comment: 9 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

I added historical membership data from 1960. Since this made the "change since 1999" row odd, I included rows for peak year (overall) and most recent peak year (the last year in which there was an increase from the previous year's membership), and change in membership since those peak years. In an effort to maintain the "traditional scouting" aspect, I did my best to differentiate between Venturing (which split from Exploring in 1998), Exploring (what the older youth program started as), and Learning for Life (which split from Exploring in 1990). In doing so, I'm taking traditional membership to mean "the high adventure program" and not "the work training program" or the "morals and ethics not including the scout oath and law" program. This is how traditional scouting is usually defined in the Report to the Nation and the At A Glance pages from National BSA, so I'm comfortable with this. ArrowmanCoder (talk) 17:38, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

The BSA defines traditional Scouting as Cub Scouting, Boy Scouting (including Varsity Scouting) and Venturing (including Sea Scouting). Learning for Life is a non-Scouting subsidiary and never split from traditional Scouting. Career-based Exploring was moved to LfL in 1998 and the remainder became Venturing. The BSA plans to change the 2014 census report by including Varsity Scouting numbers in the Venturing count.
And no one has yet shown a correlation between membership and the controversies. --  Gadget850 talk 19:40, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
Correlation or causation? However there are almost certainly multiple factors for the decline (now if the BSA/GSUSA could only figure out what UK Guiding and the Scouting Association are doing right [both increased membership last year]). I've now added the 2014 information from the Annual Report and did the percent changes since 1999 which is when the current structure was established. --Erp (talk) 03:16, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

BSA rules have changed- ban lifted 7/10/15

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

http://scoutingnewsroom.org/blog/update-on-adult-leadership-standards/ 66.194.26.66 (talk) 22:07, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Boy Scouts of America membership controversies. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 22:14, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Boy Scouts of America membership controversies. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 06:09, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Boy Scouts of America membership controversies. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:46, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 13 external links on Boy Scouts of America membership controversies. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:39, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Boy Scouts of America membership controversies. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:41, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Boy Scouts of America membership controversies. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:16, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Boy Scouts of America membership controversies. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:13, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

Atheists and scouting

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I've started a discussion at Talk:Boy Scouts of America#atheists and scouting given some of the recent edits here and on that article on this issue. --Erp (talk) 04:53, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

Scouting and the Confederacy

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

65.196.107.215 (talk) 20:05, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Boy_Scouts_of_America_membership_controversies/Archive_10&oldid=1217557728"