Talk:Bowl-out

Wickets

Do they bowl at one wicket or three ? Can the article be specific on this ? Tintin (talk) 08:54, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

My understanding is that they bowl at an unguarded wicket, that is three stumps plus bails. -- ALoan (Talk) 11:10, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

Better Picture

As pretty as the picture is, could we have photo Graemec2 12:05, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

If you can find one with acceptable copyright status, please add it. -- ALoan (Talk) 12:16, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

That's pathetic. A drawing of a photo is ridiculously uncyclopeadic. You jerk offs are changing wikipedia into a joke.

I think it's a good idea that just needs to be nurtured. Reminiscent of clean room design. The drawings just need to be better. MrAngy 00:47, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

Holy moley, that is poor, it's like something out of South Park. It's totally unnecessary - if somebody is confused as to the layout of a cricket pitch, they can look in the cricket article. A photo would be great, but until we have one the article looks infinitely better with no image at all. — sjorford++ 13:43, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

Image up for deletion on commons Image:Bowl-out-nz-wi.JPG

FYI Ganeshk (talk) 22:53, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

misses

Can someone add a note to explain why professional cricketers miss completely so often in bowl outs but can place the ball so well when bowling normally? How hard can it be to hit an unguarded wicket as a professional bowler? Turkeyphan^t 15:25, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bowl-out. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110928113842/http://static.ecb.co.uk/files/cct20-rules-2009-final-10524.pdf to http://static.ecb.co.uk/files/cct20-rules-2009-final-10524.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:20, 20 January 2018 (UTC)