Talk:Bourne Publishing Group

Unsigned AfD Comment

I feel that this page holds vital information about a small publisher who is based in a historic market town in Lincolnshire. Stamford often appears in TV shows and Films in the UK and its attractions are already well documented on Wikipedia. My page is simply providing information about a publisher who is not based in London, I am not attempting to promote anything and the page simply provides information about a number of class leading magazine titles. Why is this up for speedy deletion in the first place? thankyou

Removing of Tags

Once again all the editing tags have been removed without discussion on this talkpage. The article does not have ANY references(WP:CITE), the article needs to be written within the guidelines of WP:MOS, there are few if any relevant internal links. Blanket removing of all edit links without gaining consensus is not inline with WP:CON. I am replacing the edit templates until these items are addressed.--«JavierMC»|Talk 16:24, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

I jus mangaed to revert a removed tags so they are starting it again

Alexnia (T) @ 19:50, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

References

I added one reference concerning the Your Dog and Your Cat magazines, but it lacks third party verification. It was cited from the Bourne Publishing Group website. Referencing statements made in the article need to be cited in this manner, but using third party references are preferable WP:SOURCES.--«JavierMC»|Talk 19:50, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

Too Advert like

Bit Advert like as mainly on the titles published. Agree with need for independent refs to verify notability, else every small Co in the contry (world) could have an article. how about press reports citing sponsorship deal as a start. - BulldozerD11 (talk) 17:35, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

Assesment

See http://simonwhaleytutor.blogspot.co.uk/2012/07/all-change_02.html for a name change in 2012. I seriously doubt whether notability has been established, and would support an afd. But to give it a chance I have added some other projects in case anyone there can help--Robert EA Harvey (talk) 09:42, 4 August 2013 (UTC).

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bourne Publishing Group. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050212072706/http://www.bournepublishinggroup.co.uk:80/ to http://www.bournepublishinggroup.co.uk

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:13, 6 November 2016 (UTC)