Talk:Bounty (Stargate SG-1)

Latest comment: 16 years ago by BetacommandBot in topic Fair use rationale for Image:Sg1-s10e15-0.png

Daniel's Status edit

How can Daniel be working diligently at the Museum of antiquities when the Quest part 2 has shown him captured by Adria, and the following episode lists him as becoming a prior. I'm going to remove the line for being logically impossible. Stile4aly 22:43, 11 January 2007 (UTC)Reply


It was never supposed to follow the Quest Part 2, The Line in the Sand is, and will now that sky have changed the schedule http://stargate-sg1-solutions.com/blog/?p=732

The episode order goes, Quest 1 + 2, Line in the Sand, Road not Taken, The Shroud, Bounty. That's the proper airing order. - Count23 02:01, 11 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Jaffa planet edit

Some of those scenes were of Chulak. Was that supposed to be Chulak itself, or a poor example of Stargate SG-1's tendancy to use Stock footage? -- SFH 22:28, 7 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

If I was Chulak, the writers are forgetting that Chulak is currently occupied by the forces of the Ori. --Dymero

Jup edit

Hold on. That Oranian bounty hunter can't be Jup. He was killed in Company of Thieves. -- SFH 22:43, 7 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Tenat was the one who died in Company of Theives. Jup was the one that Tenat and Mitchell "Cut out" of the deal they made - 59.167.30.156 02:08, 9 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Here's what I want to know, which episode stated that their race name is "Oranian"?


Faris b 05:25, 9 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

  • Vala called Tenat "Tenat of Oran" in "Prometheus Unbound", so from there you got Oranians. Probably fanon, but it is widely accepted, even here. -- SFH 00:56, 10 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

I remember that, but I didn't assume that meant that. It could just be a place they're from like how the Jaffa do the names of different places on Chulak, it doesn't necessarily mean the name of their race. It could be the planet's name though.

Faris b 02:59, 10 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Richard Dean Anderson cameo? edit

I'm not certain, but in this screenshot the security guard appears to be Richard Dean Anderson. --opello 23:54, 18 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

It's not him. Plus, you know how much he doesn't want to be on the show anymore, why would he make a cameo?

Faris b 04:02, 19 February 2007 (UTC)Reply


Trivia edit

But... the pilot of Firefly was Serenity. And the only similarity to The Train Job is that they boarded a "train." They didn't steal anything. And no Alliance Federals were harmed really that I can recall...

Anyway. Not everything having to do with Kansas has to do with the Wiz. I kinda doubt that was their intention. The Dukes of Hazard was mentioned in the little trivia tidbit, and I am pretty confident that's the only thing on their minds. Notice her short shorts, which are called Daisy Dukes for a reason. Also, the short shirt, and weed she's chewin' on. Totally Daisy. Besides, Dorothy ain't no expert marksman (that we know of). Sharprs 02:19, 8 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

The Dukes of Hazzard likely took place in Hazzard County, Kentucky. Cam has a southern accent, just like Ben Browder. Not a midwestern accent. So, strange that it was in Kansas. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by QuizzicalBee (talkcontribs) 14:40, 12 May 2007 (UTC).Reply

Why'd they let Ventrell go? edit

Here's s list of Ventrell's crimes, going purely by human laws governing the USA.

  • 1) Assault & Battery (Knocking out the man for his suit in the parking lot, and all the violence in the party itself)
  • 2) Assault with a deadly weapon (All that shooting)
  • 3) Destruction of property (Breaking through the roof of the gym)
  • 4) Attempted kidnapping (Taking SG-1 out to the ship)
  • 5) Hostage taking (What's the actual name for that crime?)
  • 6) Impersonating an officer (Mitchell's voice to the SGC)
  • 7) Illegal entry into the USA (I'm pretty sure he doesn't have a passport)

This doesn't count all the crimes which fall outside the laws of reality, but not the laws of the fictional Stargate universe (Killing the alien bounty hunter for example). Some are relatively minor, some aren't, but it's still a tidy sum of misdemeanors and felonies that would guarantee a good amount of jailtime, even if he is technically an alien (We've held alien prisoners before).

Now, it's quite clear that they let him go hoping he'd kill Netan (Or at lest try to), but as they themselves mention, this is likely to happen anyway, and we even see another person attempt to assassinate him before Ventrell got to him. With such a list of crimes to his name, why the heck do they let him go? JBK405 04:42, 12 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

What's wrong with trivia section edit

There's a note at the top of this entry that the Trivia section should be integrated into the rest of the entry. Why is that?QuizzicalBee 13:23, 21 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

It's the general Wikipedia policy that Trivia sections are a no-no, they're usually filled with random meaningless data and in list form, both of which Wikipedia is against. However, important information, relevant to the shows production or content, is valid. The trivia section's don't need to be completely removed, but they need to be shrunk as far as possible to remove all that excess fluff (Of course, what counts as "fluff" really is a subjective kind of thing). JBK405 14:56, 13 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Generally the aim is to eventually reduce the article to no trivia section (by integration/writing new prose, etc.) - people do add some really bad things to these sections. Matthew 14:59, 13 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Sg1-s10e15-0.png edit

 

Image:Sg1-s10e15-0.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 00:40, 27 September 2007 (UTC)Reply