Talk:Boundary problem (spatial analysis)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Boundary problem (spatial analysis). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111004212256/http://lh5.ggpht.com/_fHD7C68ZqPM/S-VBeClLMcI/AAAAAAAAARc/Fg3kytstuUg/s640/BP.jpg to http://lh5.ggpht.com/_fHD7C68ZqPM/S-VBeClLMcI/AAAAAAAAARc/Fg3kytstuUg/s640/BP.jpg

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:21, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

Confusing phrase

I can't find the phrase "avval anish halani analysis" anywhere else online and I don't know what it means. Could it be explained more clearly in the article or removed? I would modify it myself but I don't know enough about the subject to tell if it is incorrect or not.

Shmuelic (talk) 19:27, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

Merger Proposal

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

To merge Boundary problem in geography into Boundary problem (spatial analysis) given overlap of both scope and content. Klbrain (talk) 15:07, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

---

I propose that Boundary problem in geography be merged into Boundary problem (spatial analysis). These two article appear to be virtual duplicates, including the 'references', with what appears to be a handful of subsequent edits. The same author created both pages. I don't believe any content from the former needs to be added to the latter (which might suggest that deletion would be a better outcome).

In addition to having had some improvements made, the latter page is also listed in the 'see also' section of the Spatial analysis page, so I believe it is a better candidate for survival. Thanks, ogenstein (talk) 05:16, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

This looks like a good idea, although I would like to note that the in geography article was larger than this one when they were created. Another thing that I would like to point out is that after it was created in geography was declined for being too essay-like, and then DGG removed G13 speedy deletion (which isn't a huge deal), resubmitted it, had the exact same thing declined again for NPOV reasons, removed G13 again, and resubmitted and accepted the article himself, never editing the content of the article. Keep in mind that this was all in 2014, but DGG might have some to add to this discussion. LittlePuppers (talk) 23:57, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

In earlier years , I marked G13 as many articles as I thought could be rescued, optimistically thinking I could get back to them. I've since realized I can only get to some, but I still continue to hope, that we will find some way of calling them to the attention of interested editors. As for this particular one now, of course a merge is a good idea. DGG ( talk ) 05:12, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

Two questions… Would merge or delete be the most appropriate action? The sections unique to the 'geography' article seem extraneous to me (but I'm not knowledgeable on the subject). Do the page's other issues (e.g. orphan, copy editing, etc…) go away automatically upon merge or deletion? Thanks, ogenstein (talk) 08:31, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

Support the merge to Boundary problem (spatial analysis), which I've also improved by working on the footnotes/references. A merge doesn't have to include a move of all material; just that unique and referenced. Klbrain (talk) 08:02, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

  Y Merger complete. Klbrain (talk) 15:07, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

External image links extracted from article

The following external links were previously in the article but have been moved here because, per Wikipedia:Images, all images in Wikipedia articles should be stored on Wikipedia or Wikimedia Commons, if allowed by an appropriate public copyright license or fair use rationale.

• Figure 1. Boundary problem: urban sprawl in central Florida (an evaluation by land cover analysis with raster datasets vs. an evaluation by population density bounded in the census tract)
• Figure 2. Boundary problem: horizontal boundaries
• Figure 3. Boundary problem: vertical boundaries
• Figure 4. A solution to the boundary problem: overbounding
• Figure 5. A solution to the boundary problem: sensitivity analysis

Biogeographist (talk) 15:43, 15 February 2020 (UTC)