Talk:Borough of Broxtowe
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Borough of Broxtowe article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
To do edit
Broxtowe case. -- Petri Krohn (talk) 10:52, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Broxtowe. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110509213923/http://www.lgbce.org.uk/all-reviews/east-midlands/nottinghamshire/broxtowe to http://www.lgbce.org.uk/all-reviews/east-midlands/nottinghamshire/broxtowe
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150315234537/http://www.broxtowe.gov.uk/index.aspx?articleid=4385 to http://www.broxtowe.gov.uk/index.aspx?articleid=4385
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:32, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
Requested move 29 September 2018 edit
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Moved: no opposition after 3 weeks(non-admin closure) Kevin McE (talk) 14:30, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
Broxtowe → Borough of Broxtowe – Per WP:NATURAL and WP:COMMONNAME the district is usually called "Broxtowe District"[1] or "Borough of Broxtowe" in a generic context even though "Broxtowe" is the preferred label by the OS, presumably when its clear from the context that you're referring to the district. The district is named after Broxtowe Wapentake and this move is consistent with WP:UKDISTRICTS ("Non-metropolitan districts with local ambiguity...". Views [[2]] show that this gets less views than Broxtowe (UK Parliament constituency) among others. Crouch, Swale (talk) 17:00, 29 September 2018 (UTC) --Relisting. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me | my contributions 19:43, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.