Talk:Born to Lie

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Kyle Peake in topic GA Review
Good articleBorn to Lie has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 29, 2021Good article nomineeListed

GA Review edit

This review is transcluded from Talk:Born to Lie/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs) 15:32, 25 March 2021 (UTC)Reply


Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose ( ) 1b. MoS ( ) 2a. ref layout ( ) 2b. cites WP:RS ( ) 2c. no WP:OR ( ) 2d. no WP:CV ( )
3a. broadness ( ) 3b. focus ( ) 4. neutral ( ) 5. stable ( ) 6a. free or tagged images ( ) 6b. pics relevant ( )
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked   are unassessed

I will start this review soon! --K. Peake 15:32, 25 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Infobox and lead edit

  • Pipe Tim Pagnotta to Sugarcult in the infobox
  • "by American band" → "by American supergroup" with the pipe
I don't know if this is necessary. Linking supergroup would create a sea of blue, and Dreamcar themselves does not refer to themselves as a supergroup, despite publications doing so.
It does make sense for avoiding that sea somewhat, but I removed the pipe in the body to avoid linking elsewhere. --K. Peake 16:36, 29 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • Change debut album to debut studio album
  • Add the release year in brackets instead
  • Pipe Tim Pagnotta to Sugarcult
  • "written by the group's four members:" → "written by the group's four members"
  • "It was released" → "The song was released"
  • The sentence about the lyrical content should be after the ones about the comp and style of the song
  • "It is an upbeat" → "It is an" because the upbeat part is not notable when you mention the actual beat later on in the sentence
  • "it was compared and" → "the song was compared and"
  • "the group's previous single, "Kill for Candy" (2017)." → "Dreamcar's previous single "Kill for Candy"." with the pipe
  • Pipe music critics to Music journalism

Background and release edit

  • "first studio album Dreamcar (2017)." → "first studio album Dreamcar."
  • "Kanal and Young, and" → "Kanal, and Young, while"
  • "doe the song," → "for the song,"
  • Are you sure the digital download and streaming release in various countries is backed up, as the only download retailer linked to is Amazon US since Spotify is streaming only?
I changed the region parameter to "United States" since there was no Apple Music single release, just a pre-order/download option on the album's Apple Music page.
  • "Dreamcar's second overall" → "Dreamcar's second one overall"
  • "It serves as the" → "It served as the"
  • "pre-ordered Dreamcar.[9][10] On the album, "Born to Lie" appears as the third song." → "pre-ordered the album.[9][10] On May 12, 2017, "Born to Lie" was included as the third song on Dreamcar."

Composition and lyrics edit

  • Img looks good!
  • Swap the Mxdwn and COS refs to be in the same order as the prose
  • "which he said contradicted" → "which he said contradicts"
  • "He compared it to" → "He compared the former to"
  • "leaned more towards" → "leans more towards"
  • "than its predecessor." → "than the predecessor."
  • Wikilink bass guitar
  • Wikilink pre-chorus per MOS:LINK2SECT
  • Wikilink chord progressions per WP:NOPIPE
  • "sings in new style" → "sings in a new style"
  • "just a little"." → "just a little."" per MOS:QUOTE on full sentences

Critical reception edit

  • Pipe music critics to Music journalism
  • "on "Born to Lie"." → "on the song." to avoid writing the title in both of the first two sentences
  • Avoid using "claimed" per WP:CLAIM
  • "performances provided "enough" → "performances provide "enough"

Track listing edit

  • Good

Credits and personnel edit

Release history edit

  • The Digital download is not backed up as being various (see my earlier comment)

References edit

  • Copyvio score looks amazing at 12.3%!!!
  • Regarding refs 4 and 5, shouldn't you add numerous Apple Music citations instead to verify a various release?
  • Mxdwn.com → mxdwn on ref 15

External links edit

  • Good

Final comments and verdict edit

  •   On hold until all of the issues are fixed, after a rather quick review! --K. Peake 17:24, 25 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
Kyle Peake – thanks again for the review. I believe I edited the article accordingly and left a couple comments above. Let me know if there is anything else I can do, thanks. Carbrera (talk) 16:25, 29 March 2021 (UTC).Reply
Carbrera  Pass now after I removed that one pipe for you; everything else looks good! --K. Peake 16:36, 29 March 2021 (UTC)Reply