Talk:Boris Ovcin

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Doctor Duh in topic Boris Ovcin

Boris Ovcin

edit

His article is already in-depth and meets WP:SPORTSBASIC. That said, I found [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [[10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], and [17], among many many more sources. Definelty has off-line sources, having been clear topic of interest in Australian league football with extensive carer including playing in fully pro Malaysian Super League. Wikipedia is supposed to be a source of knowledge, and this article is a "yes" to Wikipedia:The one question. Article needs improvement, not deletion. Regarding most of the consistent pro-deletion users, I dont understand why they spend all their effort deleting other peoples honest hard work instead of improving them, especially most pro-deletion users I have encountered who have a double standard where they either support Wikipedia:SNG where the article doesn't need to meet WP:GNG or have sometimes created articles of people with less coverage than this one. (I support article creation, but many pro-deletion users double standard is very frustrating). Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 04:00, 8 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

A significant number of these links lead to archived snapshots of Google Translate pages. I have no idea what to make of this. Dr. Duh 🩺 (talk) 14:39, 8 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for adding to your original comment, but I still don't understand what these archived pages (such as [3]) represent, or where those texts originally come from, which is naturally information that is needed when one is supposed to estimate their relevance. Dr. Duh 🩺 (talk) 12:27, 10 April 2023 (UTC)Reply