| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Borealosaurus article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
In media edit
Cut and paste from the article:
"Borealosaurus might have appered in Prehistoric Park, but known as a titanosaur"
What evidence is there to suggest that this titanosaur was Borealosaurus (i.e. the context)? J. Spencer 13:58, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
See in prehistoric park then. Bingodile 14:55, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
- Is this assessment from a viewer's after-the-fact decision using the general time and place of the setting, or did someone actually say Borealosaurus? The difference is that the first case is original research, which is prohibited on Wikipedia, but the second is just a matter of plugging in a reference. It could very well be Borealosaurus, but without them saying so, it could also just be a generic titanosaur, or even an unnamed titanosaur from the same area that the show's producers knew about (it's not uncommon to have multiple genera of sauropods in a formation). J. Spencer 15:36, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
Heres a quick link Prehistoric Park#Dinosaurs. Bingodile —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bingodile (talk • contribs) 19:18, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
- You can't use Wikipedia to cite Wikipedia; also, it appears that you (personally) added that information. J. Spencer 19:30, 14 October 2007 (UTC)