Talk:Booster Juice
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Ingredients
editI removed the long list of ingredients; it is not of encyclopedic value. (generally, I question the notworthiness for the article itself, but I'll address that later). --ZimZalaBim (talk) 03:22, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
If Alberta was a country, it would be the second richest in the world behind Luxembourgh, therefore, companies based in Alberta's capital have a bearing on business and what will become recongnized as Alberta's wealth, political power, power as a supplier to US (energy), and population growth, which make many things about Alberta important. Alberta, and Edmonton in particular, have produced many small companies recently that have incredibly fast growth within the province, and possibilty for growth around the world. Therefore this one page is usefull and noteworthy. I prefer people who want to get rid of an article come out and make an arguement, instead of making claims of non-noteworthyness (Like my new word?) without backing it up in a clear manner. So you see, it appears I have chosen to address it now. Jeremy99 05:18, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
- Criteria for notability of corporations and businesses can be found at WP:CORP; the company itself - not the economy of its surroundings, however good that might be - must be able to meet those guidelines, including multiple, non-trivial references as set out in the policies for articles. Feel free to improve the article if you feel you can do so and remove the notability concerns. Cheers. Tony Fox (arf!) 05:53, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
- To reiterate what Tony has said, I put the NN tag on the top, because the article doesn't show that it meets the primary notability criterion. That isn't to say that it isn't notable, but just that the article, if it is to remain, needs to show it's notability. McKay 14:32, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
Notability
editGreat! we've got one good source. WP:N requests 2. Find another, and I'll be off your back. McKay 06:12, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Booster Juice. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060318033631/http://www.canadianbusiness.com/managing/strategy/article.jsp?content=20060130_74258_74258 to http://www.canadianbusiness.com/managing/strategy/article.jsp?content=20060130_74258_74258
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:24, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Booster Juice. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121116072151/http://www.bananacommunications.com/testsite3/about.html to http://www.bananacommunications.com/testsite3/about.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121116072207/http://www.bananacommunications.com/testsite3/portfolio.html to http://www.bananacommunications.com/testsite3/portfolio.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:53, 23 July 2017 (UTC)