This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religious texts, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Religious textsWikipedia:WikiProject Religious textsTemplate:WikiProject Religious textsReligious texts articles
Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
'It will be convenient here to give the contents of the edition printed by Andrew Hart at Edinburgh in 1611.' What? Tpacw (talk) 13:26, 24 August 2008 (UTC)Reply
Tpacw: I don't understand your question. --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk)
Hroðulf: I agree with :Tpacw: here in questioning this "sentence" but would extend the query on into the at least the following thing, which starts with a lower case "and". It might be that these were intended to be a single compound sentence but it isn't clear what was meant. One wonders who giving the contents is convenient for in this context; that's a very odd construction. Glimfeather (talk) 20:17, 29 June 2011 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Book of Common Order/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
A good amount of info about the original. A bit more about the new versions would be great. Blarneytherinosaurgabby? 05:00, 12 July 2007 (UTC)Reply
Last edited at 05:00, 12 July 2007 (UTC).
Substituted at 10:02, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
