Talk:Bongo (Australian TV series)
Latest comment: 9 years ago by Steel1943 in topic Requested move 6 February 2015
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Requested move 6 February 2015
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Steel1943 (talk) 01:18, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
Bongo (Australian TV series) → Bongo (TV series) – The existing redirect points to DD National, which does not mention a series named Bongo. List of programs broadcast by DD National doesn't mention one either. The existing redirect has no history. Nick Number (talk) 22:15, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose some evidence that Bongo (Indian TV series) never existed please. In ictu oculi (talk) 23:20, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
- The burden of proof is on the person asserting that it did exist and is notable. I see that you've just added a mention of it to the DD National article. That should be sufficient to merit an entry on the dab for Bongo (Indian TV series), as you've also added. Since it's not clear that either series is a primary topic, Bongo (TV series) should be re-pointed to Bongo#Entertainment, with an {{R from incomplete disambiguation}} tag. Nick Number (talk) 00:42, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
- Well I didn't think it would be so easy to find evidence when I asked, but a simple Google click showed dozens of reliable sources, so I added one. Do you see any need to continue with the RM? In ictu oculi (talk) 05:11, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
- No. I'm re-pointing Bongo (TV series). Nick Number (talk) 19:55, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
- Well I didn't think it would be so easy to find evidence when I asked, but a simple Google click showed dozens of reliable sources, so I added one. Do you see any need to continue with the RM? In ictu oculi (talk) 05:11, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.