Talk:Bonda people

India: Odisha Mid‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Odisha (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article was last assessed in January 2024.

Ethnic groups High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ethnic groups, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to ethnic groups, nationalities, and other cultural identities on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ethnic groupsWikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groupsTemplate:WikiProject Ethnic groupsEthnic groups articles

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Ethnic groups open tasks:

Here are some open WikiProject Ethnic groups tasks:

Meta-tasks:
- Place the {{Ethnic groups}} template on the talk page of articles within the scope of this project.
- Resolve the disparity in importance rankings among different ethnic groups
Articles about ethnic groups that currently have issues needing resolution:
Start an article:
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groups/Article requests

Feel free to edit this list or discuss these tasks.

[Untitled] edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hello there,

I've seen you had edited the Wikipedia article on Bonda people. This sentence is not referenced and I would like to know what leads to it : "It is not safe to go into their tribal areas."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bonda_people

Thank you very much. Rémi Tournebize (talk) 11:08, 3 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

The sentence has been in the article since the article was created in February, 2006. I left it in because I saw no reason to remove it, as it was most likely written by someone who had personal knowlege of the matter. (It did occur to me that removing this sentence might have more serious adverse consequences than allowing it to remain.) Wikipedia editors need to learn that not everything in Wikipedia requires a reference. If that were the standard, the project would immediately collapse -- indeed, it would not have been possible to start it in the first place. Wahrmund (talk) 18:26, 3 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Add topic