| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bomberman: Act Zero article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find video game sources: "Bomberman: Act Zero" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk |
 | The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future: |
Outfit edit
Huh? I don't get it. Have you got the wrong cover or something? Bomberman wears a blue and white outfit, and isn't a cyborg.
The whole idea was to reinvent bomberman for the next generation. Is not wrong its just new. And most people agree its bad. I havent played the game and probably never will and id love to see something about the plot of the game on the page. Widkid85 01:39, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
- would it be worth noting that this bomberman looks like the original from the NES box art
The design is nowhere near that box art.
Game Title edit
Looking at the game box...isn't the game's title "Bomberman - Act: Zero"?
- Yeah, I wanted to comment on that too. Is the official title "Bomberman - Act: Zero", or "Bomberman: Act Zero" with a faulty texts on the box?
Canon? bomberman has story?
Original Research edit
I have removed this warning flag, as there are references right on the page to how bad the score was.
Vandalism edit
I have just cleaned out the page, due to vandalism. It should be back to the state it was originally in, before BiggNife vandalized it into something fowl and unfriendly to the human eyes. May I suggest the ban of BiggNife before he vandalizes yet another innocent page?--Lunestar Aesther (talk) 05:25, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
Excuse me, why are you accusing me of vandalism? If you look at the history of the page, those edits were done by IP address 173.55.39.81. All I did was re-phrase the first few sentences. I did absolutely nothing wrong, and the history proves it. Next time, make sure you know who to blame before you start pointing fingers. BiggNife (talk) 18:36, 23 June 2009 (UTC)