Talk:Bolas spider

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Peter coxhead in topic Classification

Highly camouflaged? edit

The Orb-weaver spider mentioned Bolas spiders are "highly camouflaged", so maybe there is a picture here already and I just can't see it, but I'm adding a picreq template anyway

Prey animals edit

On the "Hunting" section, it seems like the bolas spiders only attract moths; however I recall that many species in fact are specialized predators of moth flies - Psychodidae (see Yeatson & Quate 1996, 1997). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.0.250.109 (talk) 16:43, 22 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bolas spider. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:16, 5 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Classification edit

As of January 2021, it seems clear from sources that bolas-using spiders belong to a clade which includes at least one genus that does not use a bolas. This clade has been called by various formal and informal names. A Field Guide to Spiders of Australia (Robert Whyte & Greg Anderson, 2017) calls the subfamily Mastophorinae "bolas spiders and allies"; other recent sources use the informal "mastophorines" for the same taxon. It's clear that bolas-using spiders, which I take to be the topic of this article, are a group within the mastophorines, which in turn can be placed within a broadly defined subfamily Cyrtarachninae s.l.

As sources vary so much at present, in the taxobox I've used Cyrtarachninae s.l., treating bolas spiders as an informal group within this taxon. The alternative would be place them within Mastophorinae in the sense of Whyte & Anderson (2017). Peter coxhead (talk) 11:35, 17 January 2021 (UTC)Reply