Talk:Boeny

Latest comment: 7 years ago by Quisqualis in topic Article is too brief

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Boeny. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:58, 5 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Article is too brief edit

It likely was written in haste, using limited sources, in order to be more than a stub. There may be some info at Madagascar, plus sources. Also check with a search engine, and maybe something relevant like a book on Google Books will pop up. Just don't fall into the same trap by slanting the article towards narrow-subject sources. Even an encyclopedia like the online 1913 Brittanica can be useful (but primarily for early history).--Quisqualis (talk) 02:51, 20 April 2017 (UTC)Reply