Talk:Bobby Timmons

Latest comment: 4 years ago by EddieHugh in topic Compositions

GA Review edit

This review is transcluded from Talk:Bobby Timmons/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) 12:47, 19 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Agree Best article I found on Bobby Timmons, even in books. Many (hard to find) informations from newspaper articles. No prejudices as common on Timmons, spans lifeapects continously. -- Room 608 10:52, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

Just a quick note to apologise for not getting back to this sooner. I've had a hard time getting a block of, say, twenty uninterrupted minutes lately, but will do my best in the forthcoming days. The Rambling Man (talk) 18:22, 31 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Comments nice work again.

  • Year ranges per WP:DATERANGE don't need to repeat centuries if they're the same.
Changed one heading, although "summer 1961 to 74" sounds odd read out: does the rule apply when a period of one year is specified?
I've reverted so it should fix your concern and I'll pipe down! The Rambling Man (talk) 11:51, 2 April 2014 (UTC)Reply
  • Would link sideman as it's not obvious to non-experts what this role entails.
Linked in lead and first mention in main text.
  • "plus several " not keen on "plus"
Changed to "and".
Must have missed that one. Thanks.
  • "hard bop" is mentioned in the infobox, refs and cats, but not in the prose.
Categories/genres... I don't like them; changed to "jazz" in infobox and removed "hard bop" from cats. The ref is a title that includes "soul jazz", which is in the main text.
  • "a time[7])," move that ref out to behind the punctuation.
7 is for what is within the brackets, so should appear within them, too.
  • "his second, final," second and final?
I think that the current version is less ambiguous: "second and final" could be two things (second... and third, which was the last); the singular "recording" removes the ambiguity, but not having it to begin with is preferable, I think.

The Rambling Man (talk) 08:44, 2 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Comments indented above. Thanks for the review and let me know if more is needed. EddieHugh (talk) 11:14, 2 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

All good for me, nice work. The Rambling Man (talk) 11:51, 2 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bobby Timmons. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:36, 5 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bobby Timmons. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:45, 22 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bobby Timmons. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:09, 25 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Compositions edit

I was expecting to see Timmons' actual compositions under the "Compositions" heading... shouldn't a list of his compositions be implemented there?

Adamilo (talk) 22:45, 14 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Presenting notable ones in the main body of the article is preferred, so no. For musicians, a discography is often presented as little more than a list in stubby articles, but compositions, for some reason, are not, and the latter point holds for better articles, such as this one. An alternative is to create a new article, as in List of compositions by Thelonious Monk. EddieHugh (talk) 23:03, 14 June 2019 (UTC)Reply