Talk:Bob the Railway Dog

Latest comment: 12 years ago by 7&6=thirteen in topic Edits

Minor updates

edit

Added some discussion noted in Adam-Smiths Book. It seems that there is more to the story than I first thought, although validating some of her claims may be a little hard, as her work is not well referenced. Some of her comments are consistent with other stories and sources. Anyways, it adds more controversy to Bob! Sulzer55 (talk) 10:45, 25 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

More tweaks

edit

Have added more information in relation to Bob, including some discussion in an article by Parker. This article raises further questions regards Bobs life and carreer. Also found a number of other refs to Bob, so will find some time to research these. Does anyone know of Bob the Firemans Dog? Sulzer55 (talk) 12:01, 26 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Major overhaul

edit

Have made a number of changes to the page to align with contemporaneous reporting of Bob. It seems that papers pinching stories is not new. The other thing that is apparent is embelishment - Bob apparently was in Melbourne before Seth Ferry Picked him up@! - so was he BTRD then, or is it a title he has earned after Ferry got him and registered him in 1884? So, have done my best to pull together the various articles, read through the spin, and come up with something reasonable.

Any comments? Sulzer55 (talk) 07:39, 29 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Railway dog trail

edit

on a recent visit to Terowie, noted the locals have put up some boards around the town and created the "Bob the railway dog trail" - did not get pics, but will do so when next there Sulzer55 (talk) 11:49, 24 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Edits

edit

Thanks to those who have been keeping an eye on this page. Am appreciative of your efforts.

I'd be grateful if you want to edit, you please use appropriate referencing, and make a comment here, that way everyone can have a think about what is happening thanks Sulzer55 (talk) 11:51, 24 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

FYI,I did a bunch of edits, mainly for style, and added a couple of wiki links, a book, and a good source. 7&6=thirteen () 11:45, 25 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
Thanks- has made a big difference Sulzer55 (talk) 12:19, 26 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
Agreed. This is the kind of an article on a relatively obscure subject that Wikipedia can do really well, and which is unlikely to exist in other encyclopedias, etc. the continuing media coverage suggests it has some relevance, at least in some parts of the world. 7&6=thirteen () 12:27, 26 March 2012 (UTC)Reply