Talk:BlueLink Information Network

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

I'm still trying to figure out how this all works! My intention is simply to provide uncontested facts about the NGO BlueLink Information Network. I'll review the help section to determine how to do that better. If you have any other immediate tips, I'm all ears!

The main problem is that the entire article reads like an advertisement, and that it'd probably just be easier to delete and recreate it than to copyedit it. At least, that's what I think. Veinor (talk to me) 14:35, 9 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Sometimes it just is. It still do have the right ro be present here. Karak1 (talk to me) 16:48, 26 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 9 external links on BlueLink Information Network. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:52, 4 November 2016 (UTC)Reply