Talk:Blood (OSI album)/GA1

Latest comment: 13 years ago by UnaLaguna in topic GA Review

GA Review edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Cannibaloki 21:19, 12 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Checklist edit

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:  
    B. MoS compliance:  
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:  
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:  
    What makes madeloud.com, metalstorm.net, rocknworld.com/thrashpit, and ultimate-guitar.com reliable sources? A person writing things like "nu metal bullshit" make it sound non-professional to me.
    The works of MadeLoud writer Andrew Reilly "has appeared in The A.V. Club, RedEye, and Ghost Factory, among others [...]". In contrast, Matt Hensch proved to be a non-professional writer in his profile for Encyclopaedia Metallum.--Cannibaloki 14:01, 13 August 2010 (UTC)Reply
    I always interpreted Professional reviews may include only reviews written by professional music journalists or DJs, or found within any online or print publication having a (paid or volunteer) editorial and writing staff (which excludes personal blogs) to mean that a review is reliable if it's written by a professional writer, or features on a reliable site per WP:RS (or both). Am I misinterpreting? Una LagunaTalk 14:40, 13 August 2010 (UTC)Reply
    Both.--Cannibaloki 14:55, 13 August 2010 (UTC)Reply
    Hmm - if both were required wouldn't "and" have been used over "or"? I don't like being pedantic, but I'm slightly surprised by this because I used similar sources for my last two WP:ALBUM GANs and they checked out fine. Una LagunaTalk 16:43, 13 August 2010 (UTC)Reply
    C. No original research:  
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:  
    B. Focused:  
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:  
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:  
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:  
    On hold for a week.--Cannibaloki 22:41, 12 August 2010 (UTC)Reply
      Passed.--Cannibaloki 21:09, 19 August 2010 (UTC)Reply
    Thanks again for your thorough review! Una LagunaTalk 11:20, 20 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Comments edit

  • Mike Portnoy of Dream Theater, who performed drums on the first two albums, was replaced by Porcupine Tree drummer Gavin Harrison on Blood. What albums?
Clarified.   Done Una LagunaTalk 10:13, 13 August 2010 (UTC)Reply
  • Matheos and Moore worked together on the album long-distance, mainly by emailing each other files. What kind of files? Audio file format?
They never specify in the interviews I've cited. They only ever talk about exchanging "files", so I think that's all we can do in the article. Una LagunaTalk 10:13, 13 August 2010 (UTC)Reply
  • Harrison had a schedule gap over summer 2008, so agreed to work on the album. Reword "summer" per WP:SEASON.
Makes sense... I'm not 100% familiar with the quarter system though - do correct me if summer in the northern hemisphere doesn't correspond to the fourth quarter! Una LagunaTalk 10:13, 13 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Doing...--Cannibaloki 21:19, 12 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Done--Cannibaloki 22:01, 12 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for taking the time to review the article! I attempted to find reviews from sites that complied with WP:ALBUMS#Reception. On a second look, I think the Ultimate Guitar review doesn't count as reliable (it seems to be submitted by a user rather than a staff member), so I'll remove it and any references to it. The other sources seem to pass WP:ALBUMS#Reception in that they have editorial and writing staff. The "nu metal bullshit" quote isn't particularly enlightening to the reader; given that there's a more articulated quote from the same reviewer immediately after it, I could probably remove it. Otherwise I don't see any problems, but if I'm misinterpreting the guidelines, do say.

I've noticed you have put a "neutral" by criterion 6B but haven't made any specific comments? Una LagunaTalk 10:13, 13 August 2010 (UTC)Reply