Talk:Blonde Phantom
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
May 2 edit
edit"Self-reflexively" is actually the right word, per Merriam-Webster:
- Main Entry: self-re·flex·ive
- Pronunciation: -ri-'flek-siv
- Function: adjective
- marked by or making reference to its own artificiality or contrivance <self-reflexive fiction>
- self-re·flex·ive·ly adverb —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Tenebrae (talk • contribs) 03:02, 3 May 2007 (UTC).
Fair use rationale for Image:AllWinners1-1948.jpg
editImage:AllWinners1-1948.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
C-Class rated for Comics Project
editAs this B-Class article has yet to receive a review, it has been rated as C-Class. If you disagree and would like to request an assesment, please visit Wikipedia:WikiProject_Comics/Assessment#Requesting_an_assessment and list the article. Hiding T 14:56, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
New Invaders
editWe have a Marvel Handbook citation for the Blonde Phantom being a member of the New Invaders. WikiProject Comics MOS discourages use of Marvel Handbook content as it is an encyclopedia itself, and citing fictional facts in, without transformative use, it may constitute copyright infringement. Do we have any actual issues of comic books that objectively depict her with the New Invaders? If not, we likely can't use that cite — not least because if it's not depicted in a fictional narrative, then it "didn't happen" within that fictional framework. --Tenebrae (talk) 16:07, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
Created by who
editWho created her this is important information that needs to be added. Fluffyroll11 (talk) 13:21, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
I would agree, but the problem is that the creators of several characters from the 1930s, 1940s, and 1950s are often unknown or disputed. Several companies did not give creator credits at all, others were inconsistent in crediting creators (lets say 6 stories in a single issue, but credits involving one or two of them). The Unofficial Handbook of Marvel Creators is currently the most detailed database on who created which Marvel stories from 1939 to the present, but even this database has entire series where no credit can be given with certainty.
Since Blonde Phantom first appeared in All Select Comics #11, lets see what the Handbook says. There are two Blonde Phantom stories in that issue, one called "The Atom spells doom" and the other called "The scarlet scorpion". The first story is credited to writer Stan Lee, penciller Syd Shores and inker Charles Nicholas. The other story has no credited writer, credits both Syd Shores and Ed Winiarski as artists, and Ed Winiarski as the inker. Dimadick (talk) 17:31, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Blonde Phantom. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120313012839/http://www.recities.com/jjnevins/phantom2.html to http://www.recities.com/jjnevins/phantom2.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:02, 11 January 2018 (UTC)