 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nothing new under the sun edit
Can you say: “Reader’s Digest?”12.89.124.50 (talk) 18:30, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
Logo edit
Please do not revert the logo to the raster version. Wikipedia policy dictates that an SVG version of higher quality is more preferred than the raster versions. 203.189.119.117 (talk) 09:09, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
- Please link to this policy. 331dot (talk) 09:10, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
- Logos of higher quality are preferred as part of existing convention, as stated in PD-textlogo template 223.25.62.214 (talk) 14:20, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
- It is also stipulated in Wikipedia:Logos that "reasonable diligence should be taken to ensure that the logo is accurate and has a high-quality appearance" 223.25.62.214 (talk) 14:22, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
- I don't see in the policy where it says a specific format is preferred, nor what is wrong with the logo as it was. You need to stop edit warring and discuss this. 331dot (talk) 14:49, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
- I would like to reiterate that Wikipedia:Logos clearly states logos must be ensured to be of high quality appearance, therefore implying that SVG formats which are far more superior than raster versions (PNG, JPG, etc) are highly preferred. Thus I am restoring the current SVG version logo. There's someone who keeps on reverting the logo to a sub-par quality version, which is a destructive and vandalizing behavior in my opinion 203.189.119.122 (talk) 02:48, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
- Someone was me- and your definition of vandalism is in error. Please see WP:VAND: "On Wikipedia, vandalism has a very specific meaning: editing (or other behavior) deliberately intended to obstruct or defeat the project's purpose," and "Even if misguided, willfully against consensus, or disruptive, any good faith effort to improve the encyclopedia is not vandalism."
- I don't see any difference at all between the quality of the logos. Per WP:BRD I request that you self-revert until you obtain a consensus for your change and adequately explain the difference between the logos. 331dot (talk) 07:43, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
- I would like to reiterate that Wikipedia:Logos clearly states logos must be ensured to be of high quality appearance, therefore implying that SVG formats which are far more superior than raster versions (PNG, JPG, etc) are highly preferred. Thus I am restoring the current SVG version logo. There's someone who keeps on reverting the logo to a sub-par quality version, which is a destructive and vandalizing behavior in my opinion 203.189.119.122 (talk) 02:48, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
- I don't see in the policy where it says a specific format is preferred, nor what is wrong with the logo as it was. You need to stop edit warring and discuss this. 331dot (talk) 14:49, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
- It is also stipulated in Wikipedia:Logos that "reasonable diligence should be taken to ensure that the logo is accurate and has a high-quality appearance" 223.25.62.214 (talk) 14:22, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
- Logos of higher quality are preferred as part of existing convention, as stated in PD-textlogo template 223.25.62.214 (talk) 14:20, 6 October 2023 (UTC)