Talk:Bleeding Cool

Comics Low‑importance

	Comics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tone edit

This page reads like it was written by the owner of the website in question.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.184.151.247 (talk • contribs) 08:44, May 8, 2019 (UTC)

Inaccurate Claims edit

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The sentence "Bleeding Cool has a reputation within the industry for breaking news and bringing to light previously unreported scandal" is blatantly untrue. Bleeding Cool's reputation is for poor writing, worse editing and a lack of focus on shows readers actually watch. Under its current leadership, it's become the laughing stock of the geek world--a British AICN. Most of its writers can't string a sentence together, and few of them have any grasp of basic grammar or punctuation. The site's reputation isn't for breaking news--it's for being broken.

There are two citations supporting that statement. If you think we should include additional information about other aspects of its reputation, we need cited reliable sources for it. -Jason A. Quest (talk) 17:48, 14 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Add topic