Talk:Black belt (martial arts)

Removed material

edit

I removed the sentence "A black belt is only a white belt that never gave up!" from the end of the first paragraph, as it struck me as being nowhere near encyclopædia material. 89.236.57.174 (talk) 15:03, 3 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Error in Misconceptions

edit

Fact-of-the-matter (talk) 14:36, 15 August 2010 (UTC)The Misconceptions section notes that the "white belt turning black with age" traditions is simply a misconception. While this is true in Japanese traditions, and in many others as well, some Kung Fu schools did practice this, for example the Shaolin, I believe (don't quote me on this, I have no sources to back it up off the top of my head) use this practice, at least at one time. In this case, if there is a misconception, it is simply that this practice was universal, rather than confined to only a few Kung Fu schools. I don't have any sources to back this up right now, as pretty much all my stuff is in boxes as I pack up for college, but I would recommend addressing the issue in some fashion, or simply removing this from the misconceptions section for now.Fact-of-the-matter (talk) 14:36, 15 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Relative Ranks

edit

Regarding the statement 'ranks coming more or less automatically with time done in Japan.' This seems to be a matter of opinion rather than fact. In fact, (Japanese) Kodokan grades in Judo are commonly perceived to be more difficult to obtain than those of other ranking organisations and therefore commonly sought after and highly valued by Western Judoka. Perhaps the original statement applies more to certain styles of Karate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 118.209.80.120 (talk)

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Black belt (martial arts). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:02, 9 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Black belt (martial arts). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:58, 3 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Black belt (martial arts). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:37, 21 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

In popular culture, we see the term "black belt" used to signify expertise in a certain field, such as a Six Sigma Black Belt certification. Kortoso (talk) 12:39, 9 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

The Actual Belt

edit

This article fails to go into the details of the belt itself. Where did it come from? How was it traditionally tied? — Preceding unsigned comment added by B0ef (talkcontribs) 22:25, 12 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Fake photo?

edit

Anyone else think this photo looks strange? The lighting looks different (compare shadows on noses, one from left, one from underneath). They look super imposed on the background. Their hand sizes look wildly different. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_belt_(martial_arts)#/media/File:Goju_NiDan_Rabyoung-Thonden-Gyalkhang.jpg TFJamMan (talk) 21:49, 8 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

I agree, it's photoshopped. The white of their ghi don't match (one more yellow, the other more blue), their heads don't match the bodies, the bodies don't match the background perspective...something is off and I don't think it should be used in an encyclopedia. Wikipedia can do better. --EarthSprite 21:07, 9 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

"Black belt(martial arts)" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  The redirect Black belt(martial arts) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 6 § Black belt(martial arts) until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 15:46, 6 November 2023 (UTC)Reply