Talk:Black-on-black ware
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Netherzone in topic Requesting reassessment from Start class
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | A fact from Black-on-black ware appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 30 December 2020 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 17:46, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
( )
Pot by María Martinez of San Ildefonso Pueblo
- ... that Black-on-black ware (example pictured) has been created by generations of Puebloan Native American ceramic artists in Northern New Mexico? Source: several
- Reviewed: Marie-Louise Lacoste
- Comment: This is the first article Netherzone wants to expose to DYK, please be patient, I'm just helping with the start and don't know much about the subject yet.
Created by Netherzone (talk). Nominated by Gerda Arendt (talk) at 23:34, 7 December 2020 (UTC).
- New article, long enough, within policy. Hook meets formatting guidelines, interesting, accurate, well-cited and neutral-toned. Image is free and works well.
shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 23:56, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you Gerda for the nomination and Shaidar for the quick review. Netherzone (talk) 14:55, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
- New article, long enough, within policy. Hook meets formatting guidelines, interesting, accurate, well-cited and neutral-toned. Image is free and works well.
Requesting reassessment from Start class
editI've made considerable improvements to the article after self-assessing it as a "Start" class article, and I am wondering if any page watchers might find a few moments to have a look at the improved article to see if it is beyond Start class. Thank you in advance! Netherzone (talk) 15:47, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
- I've rated it a cautious C - really it could be B. Johnbod (talk) 16:29, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
- @Johnbod: thank you very much for having a look at the article. I will continue to work on it as I uncover more information about this type of pottery (there are some additional books on order). Hopefully it will be a solid "B" in the next few weeks. Have a nice holiday season. Netherzone (talk) 17:17, 22 December 2020 (UTC)