Talk:Bitconnect/Archive 1
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Promotional
This page was said to have few lines that sound promotional but I read through it thoroughly but couldn't find any, I hope a more experienced editor will come in and rephrase the line that sounds promotional and he or she should come in to the talk page and tell how h or she did it and how they identified the lines that needs editing, I really want to learn
Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Action1212 (talk • contribs) 21:50, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
- @Action1212: Like you, I don't see anything promotional about the article, so I have removed the tag from it. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 23:04, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
Ohh I though as much. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Action1212 (talk • contribs) 08:49, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
This page is an advertisement. Doesn't mention anywhere the impossible rate of returns claimed by the business and the Ponzi scheme nature of its withdrawal process. Investors can only withdraw money by having a new investor buy their old tokens. That's a textbook definition of a Ponzi scam. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 114.198.24.95 (talk) 18:08, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
The above comment contains incorrect information. To withdraw money from Bitconnect the investor first exchanges BCC to BTC on the Bitconnect platform, to then transfer these bitcoins to a bitcoin wallet. As of yet it is uncertain whether Bitconnect is a Ponzi. Although the rate of return suspects it to be, people do state they withdraw money from the platform, and receive back the sums they invested as soon as the one year period has passed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.243.188.161 (talk) 18:07, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
Contested deletion
This page should not be speedily deleted because is has had significant news coverage since October 2017 when it was last deleted. It was also a poor close in its AfD, as it had more keeps than opposes, and the closer gave no rationale for their decision. --Fuzheado | Talk 23:23, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
Contested deletion
This page should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here) --2601:249:D00:3:1176:E293:B1AC:D946 (talk) 00:25, 18 January 2018 (UTC)