Talk:Bitcoin Cash/Archive 9
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 5 | ← | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | Archive 9 |
Update Development Section
 | This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined. |
COI disclaimer: I currently produce The Bitcoin Cash Podcast. There is no "official" bitcoin cash podcast & we are simply users with interest in the coin, but I figured I just be absolutely clear. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.55.189.239 (talk) 21:04, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
I noticed only Bitcoin Unlimited is listed under the implementation(s) section. The current node implementations are as follows: BCHN, BCHD, BU, Bitcoin Verde, & Knuth.[1] Those implementations also have much more recent releases than what is listed, including BU. BCHN is on V24.1.0, updated on May 29th, 2022[2] BCHD is on v0.19.0, updated on May 05, 2022[3] BU is on 1.10.0.0, updated on April 5th, 2022[4] Bitcoin Verde is on v2.2.0, updated on Jan 05, 2022[5] and lastly, Knuth is on v0.24.0, updated May 5th 2022[6]
- Hi, we are only using high quality WP:RS for all cryptocurrency articles. Things like bloomberg, wsj, fortune.com, etc. We cannot use any contributor sources as well. Thanks! Jtbobwaysf (talk) 21:21, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
- The current development section contains a single citation to a specific bitcoin unlimited release on gitlab. Should that be completely removed, then? 47.55.189.239 (talk) 21:34, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
- Yes, it could be removed, or you could just update the version. Sometimes these type of non-controversial edits dont get removed. I dont have any big objection to it if is just a version number. Or you could remove it as well if it is confusing. I personally have no idea what version the SW is on Jtbobwaysf (talk) 02:13, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
- The current development section contains a single citation to a specific bitcoin unlimited release on gitlab. Should that be completely removed, then? 47.55.189.239 (talk) 21:34, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
- There are zero mainstream articles on this subject and the quality of this Wikipedia page is suffering for it. Why not cite directly from the blockchain which nodes are being used? Surely that would be a reliable source. 2601:283:4602:FE00:A888:66D4:ECA7:A83 (talk) 10:05, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
References
- ^ "nodes". bitcoincash.org. Retrieved 13 June 2022.
- ^ "bchn releases". gitlab. Retrieved 13 June 2022.
- ^ "bchd releases". github. Retrieved 13 June 2022.
- ^ "BU releases". gitlab. Retrieved 13 June 2022.
- ^ "Bitcoin Verde Releases". github. Retrieved 13 June 2022.
- ^ "Knuth releases". github. Retrieved 13 June 2022.
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 28 June 2023
 | This edit request to Bitcoin Cash has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
change "Latest release 1.9.1 / 17 February 2021; 2 years ago" to "Latest release 2.0.0.0 / 8 May 2023" 193.235.219.5 (talk) 09:00, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 19:03, 28 June 2023 (UTC)