Talk:Birmingham St George's F.C./GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Harrias (talk · contribs) 10:08, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

I'll look this over. Harrias ^{(he/him) • talk} 10:08, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

Immediate failures

An article can be failed without further review (known as a quick fail) if, prior to the review:

1. It is a long way from meeting any one of the six good article criteria
2. It contains copyright violations
3. It has, or needs, cleanup banners that are unquestionably still valid. These include {{cleanup}}, {{POV}}, {{unreferenced}} or large numbers of {{citation needed}}, {{clarify}}, or similar tags (See also {{QF}})
4. It is not stable due to edit warring on the page
5. It has issues noted in a previous GA review that still have not been adequately addressed, as determined by a reviewer who has not previously reviewed the article

• 1. A large amount of this article is not suitably referenced, meaning that it is impossible to tell where the information comes from, and therefore whether it is original research. This means the article falls a long way short of meeting Criterion 2, "Verifiable with no original research".
• 3. As a further consequence of this, the article has a large number of {{citation needed}} templates.

• Overall, this reads as a decent article, but unfortunately at this stage, I have to judge that it simply isn't ready for the GA process. I would recommend working through the article more or less sentence by sentence and adding inline citations for the facts presented. The Grounds, Records and Notable players could also do with expansion into prose to give them more context, but that mostly goes beyond the requirements of the GA criteria. I would very much encourage you to continue to work on this article and return to GA with it, but I'm afraid it just isn't there yet. Harrias ^{(he/him) • talk} 10:08, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.