Talk:Birch gun

Latest comment: 6 years ago by Charlie Landships in topic Claims in opening paragraph.

Claims in opening paragraph.

edit

The claims about the prejudicial beliefs, political pressure, and the gun's potential need to be backed up by some sort of source. An article about the beliefs/pressure that led to the project being scrapped, or possibly some reference to a recognized expert on such weapons (to validate the claims of great potential), could be useful. Otherwise, we should find some way of rewording this opening paragraph. Nihixul 00:33, 3 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

The initial claim that the Birch guns were the first practical SPGs is just rubbish. By the time the Birch guns first appeared the 75 French Saint-Chamond heavy SPGs were being held in reserve as a force in being - they would later be deployed in 1940. The Americans had built a whole series of "motorised gun carriages" - the Mark II with 155mm gun made it to production before the end of WW2. The Holt designed Mark X and Christie SPGs with 155mm guns/8 inch howitzers were considered for production immediately before the US Army artillery board turned back to the horse. The British built 48 Gun Carriers which could mount and fire a 6inch howitzer - the British Army had no clue how to use them. There are articles on Landships II (landships.info) on all of these. Charlie Landships (talk) 09:14, 17 October 2017 (UTC)Reply